Internal Memorandum
| Date: |
December 23,
2003 |
| To: |
All Delta
Employees |
| From: |
Jerry Grinstein,
Chief Executive Officer, effective January 2004 |
| Subject:
|
A Report On
Executive Compensation |
Based on talks with many of you during my
stops across the Delta system in the past three weeks, I know that executive
compensation remains a controversial issue. As we move into a new year, it
is important for us to clear the air on that topic so we can focus all our
energy on the urgent job of making Delta strong and profitable again.
With that in mind, this memo has two purposes. First, it will give you my
early thinking on how Delta should address executive compensation in the
future. Second, because I understand the value you place on clear, timely
communication about these matters, it will outline how we intend to handle
two previously reported executive compensation programs that require action
in the near future.
Executive compensation is a tough issue during bad times. On one hand, as
with the front-line and all other work groups, Delta needs a competitive
compensation program to attract, retain and motivate a highly skilled team.
On the other hand, an executive compensation package that includes normal
elements such as earned incentive pay (sometimes called “bonuses”) can seem
inappropriate when the company is losing money and other employees are
making sacrifices. Keeping these conflicting needs in balance presents a
difficult but necessary challenge.
That said, here are three early thoughts regarding executive compensation:
- First, all components of executive
compensation should be competitive, performance-driven and closely aligned
with shareholder value and the long-term interest of the company.
- Second, when sacrifice is required, it
should be shared among all employee groups.
- Third, any cash incentive awards should
reflect the performance of the company and the individual, and should take
into account profitability and shareholder value.
Work is underway to develop a revised
approach to executive compensation at Delta which reflects these principles.
We intend to discuss this with the Board of Directors in January.
Moving to my second point: As was reported in the 2003 Proxy, a retention
program to maintain stability in Delta's leadership team was established in
January 2002 for officers (vice presidents and above). You will recall that
early 2002 was a time of unmatched danger and uncertainty for our company
and our industry. The intent of the program was to keep the leadership team
in place. Continuity of management at Delta in the immediate aftermath of
9/11 has been important in terms of maintaining access to capital markets.
The retention awards issued in early 2002
become payable to participants in January. A number of officers, however,
have asked to defer all or part of the awards based on the current
conditions facing the company. Others, however, may not now be in a position
to make such deferrals. I fully understand and respect both situations. In
an effort to respond to those who would like to defer all or part of their
retention payments, we have established a new program.
Under the terms of this voluntary program, deferred awards will be paid once
Delta has been profitable for one full year or in 2007, whichever comes
first. The program also will provide payment to participants should they
leave Delta, since the rewards have already been earned. In any case, the
deferral option will not result in any increase of the amount of award paid
to the recipient. Also, the company will maintain the confidentiality of the
individual decisions. Please remember also that Leo Mullin and Fred Reid
have rescinded their retention awards, and Michele Burns, Vicki Escarra and
Bob Colman have agreed to defer their awards over the next three years.
While there is no perfect solution, I believe this is the most appropriate
response under the current circumstances.
On a different executive compensation matter, the Board has decided not to
award 2003 annual incentive compensation to Delta officers, even if earned
by meeting the performance goals established at the beginning of the year.
As a result, no annual incentive awards will have been paid to officers in
two of the past three years. This reduction in total compensation for
officers is in addition to the 8% pay cut earlier in 2003. Leo and Fred took
even deeper pay cuts.
The Board has decided, however, to consider at its next meeting the payment
of annual incentive compensation for other eligible employees below the vice
president level, if earned. The Board’s decision to consider the matter is
based in large part on its awareness that compensation for this group
generally runs well below the competitive marketplace.
My visits with you around the system have provided new insights while also
confirming my faith in the wisdom and commitment of the Delta team. They
will continue in 2004 and beyond. Thank you for your candor, your ideas and
your enthusiasm for the hard work ahead. We have talked about difficult
issues like the one discussed in this memo, but those discussions have been
professional and focused on moving ahead with what is best for our company.
If we don’t see each other until after the New Year, you and your family
have my best wishes for a very happy holiday season.
 |
|
Jerry Grinstein |
|